Menu Close

Bad Words in the Church: "Evaluation"

This is the sixth in a series on “Bad Words in the Church.” As a supervisor, how do you practice Ephesians 4:15 and 4:29? (“Speaking the truth in love” and “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs.”) When it comes to managing staff, I’m afraid that most ministry leaders focus exclusively on “speaking love” and “building others up” with words of encouragement. Don’t get me wrong – encouragement is extremely important. But if this is the only feedback being given, then it’s not very likely that the staff member’s performance will improve. That is why evaluation is so important. The problem is that evaluation involves some level of confrontation, and that makes it a bad word in many ministry settings. In the church, we emphasize compassion and mercy as we should. But we mistakenly think this means that there will always be peace. We equate conflict with sin. Of course, it’s hard to support that belief if you read the gospels or the epistles. The challenge of doing evaluation also highlights the mistakes assumption that negative feedback means someone is a “bad” person. Since “good” people receive positive evaluations, then any suggestions for improvement get blown out of proportion. Shouldn’t it be possible to discuss an area of concern without it being seen as a deep character flaw? (This is also the reason that programs are rarely evaluated.) The issue is compounded because most ministry leaders have little training in how to conduct an evaluation, and they often have inadequate tools for assessing performance. When this happens, the evaluation process rarely accomplishes the desired outcome. A person may be crushed by a negative message or simply clueless because the intended message was delivered in a confusing way. For all these reasons, ministry leaders often try to avoid the dirty word of evaluation. But there is one compelling reason to press into it. God deserves our best, individually and collectively. If we turn our head rather than addressing poor performance, our ministries will never realize their full potential. I’d rather have a hard conversation with someone today than face my Master at the end of my life and try to explain why I didn’t.]]>

Related Posts

2 Comments

  1. caroline poe

    I hate evaluation – the thought of giving or receiving! Do I want to make things better? Yes! Do I want to destroy the efforts of others or my own heart in the midst? No way!
    If God cares more about the heart than the appearance, how do we do the same? How do we encourage people/ourselves to see our work as a worship offering to Him rather than a burnt offering?

    • admin

      It sounds like I struck a nerve. My contention is that it’s possible to do an evaluation without destroying others. I also believe that we all want to improve – as you said – and that we all have blind spots. We can certainly improve through reflection and self-evaluation, but the greatest improvement comes when we hear the feedback from others, delivered in the right way. It’s the wrong ways in which evaluation is done that makes it a “bad word,” not the concept of evaluation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *